All posts

Entry 001: From dashboard to field notes

Notes

How a Care Index dashboard became a working notebook for learning to invest in public.

 

Notes

A short version, for anyone who lands here cold: Carefolio is now my public lab notebook for learning to invest. One Sunday entry a week. Sources cited. The brokers I would actually use. The screen I run companies through. The research that says my cohort is mostly missing from the data.

It got there in one day. Some of that day was useful, most of it was the work I do for a living, applied to a domain I am deliberately new to. I want to write down how it shifted, because I have already forgotten most of why we made each turn, and the rule of the site is that anything I cannot explain by Sunday is something I do not yet understand.

I had a dashboard

The morning of, I had a working application called Care Index Dashboard. Emerald and purple. A bullseye logo. It tracked S&P 500 companies on a 0-to-100 score across sixteen signals: IVF coverage, paid maternity, women in leadership, equal pay audits, things like that. It was a real product with a real methodology.

It was a dashboard. It was the same kind of object as fifty other YC-funded SaaS products. The Care Score methodology was the only thing that distinguished it from those, and it was buried two clicks deep.

False start: the simulator

The first pivot was wrong, but it taught me something. I tried to reframe the product as an AI-powered portfolio simulator. Pick a goal, see a shortlist of high-Care-Score companies, run a backtest, project twenty years out. There is a real product in that direction (it is broadly what Female Invest is doing in their UK arm), but it is also a regulated product. The line between simulation and investment advice is the line between “you can ship this from your kitchen table” and “you need a Central Bank of Ireland authorisation, which costs months and money.”

I caught myself before writing too much of the wrong code. The product was wrong because the protagonist was wrong. The simulator framing made Carefolio the protagonist and me the operator. That is not the company I want to be running.

The right answer

The reframe came from a sentence I have used in every product design role I have held: writing in public is the cheapest way to find out what you actually understand. I read a lot. Most of it falls out of my head within a week if I do not write it down. I have been notebooking my way through investing for months in private. The product was already there: it was the notebook.

So Carefolio became what it is now. A documented personal journey. An immigrant woman in her forties, in Dublin, learning to invest in public. Editorial publication first, research site second, practical guide third. The Care Score is no longer the product. It is my personal filter. The brokers page is no longer the product. It is the methods section of the lab.

That reframe also fixed the regulatory question. Documenting what I bought, in the past tense, in the first person, with sources, is not regulated activity in Ireland. The Central Bank of Ireland Consumer Protection Code 2025 has plenty to say about finfluencers; almost none of it touches a person who writes “I bought X on this date, here is what I read about it.”

The design moves that mattered

A few decisions worth recording, since they are the kind I will reach for again.

The metaphor came from product design, not finance. Once Carefolio was a working notebook, the four pages laid themselves out: /journal is the field notes, /method is the screening rules, /brokers is the methods section, /research is the literature review. Designers will recognise that structure. I picked it because it works.

The numbers are flagged as provisional until I verify them. I quote three statistics on the site: 57% of European women invest versus 71% of men (BlackRock, 2023), the EU gender pension gap of 26.1% (Eurostat, 2022 data), and women in Europe start investing four years later than men on average (BlackRock, 2023). All three are from credible primary sources. None has been cross-checked against the original PDF in this session. Every page that quotes them carries a working draft banner. This will be the first real research task in the journal.

 

 

 

Leave a thought